Enemy at the Gates | 
 enlarge | Actors: Matthais Habich, Ed Harris, Bob Hoskins, Eva Mattes, Ron Perlman
Studio: Paramount
Category: DVD
List Price: $9.98
Buy Used: $1.39
You Save: $8.59 (86%)
New (75) Used (100) Collectible (2) from $1.39
Avg. Customer Rating:  375 reviews
Sales Rank: 4696
Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, Dvd-video, Subtitled, Widescreen, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitled)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 131
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5.4 x 0.5
MPN: 097363386247
ISBN: 0792172760
UPC: 097363386247
EAN: 9780792172765
ASIN: B00003CXRA
Theatrical Release Date: 2001
Release Date: August 14, 2001
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Russian sniper, Vassili Zaitsev becomes a hero fighting the Nazis during the battle of Stalingrad, and comes face to face with Major Konig, a Nazi sniper bent on stopping him.
Genre: Feature Film-Drama
Rating: R
Release Date: 29-DEC-2004
Media Type: DVD
Amazon.com
Like Saving Private Ryan, Enemy at the Gates opens with a pivotal event of World War II--the German invasion of Stalingrad--re-created in epic scale, as ill-trained Russian soldiers face German attack or punitive execution if they flee from the enemy's advance. Director Jean-Jacques Annaud captures this madness with urgent authenticity, creating a massive context for a more intimate battle waged amid the city's ruins. Embellished from its basis in fact, the story shifts to an intense cat-and-mouse game between a Russian shepherd raised to iconic fame and a German marksman whose skill is unmatched in its lethal precision. Vassily Zaitzev (Jude Law) has been sniping Nazis one bullet at a time, while the German Major Konig (Ed Harris) has been assigned to kill Vassily and spare Hitler from further embarrassment. There's love in war as Vassily connects with a woman soldier (Rachel Weisz), but she is also loved by Danilov (Joseph Fiennes), the Soviet officer who promotes his friend Vassily as Russia's much-needed hero. This romantic rivalry lends marginal interest to the central plot, but it's not enough to make this a classic war film. Instead it's a taut, well-made suspense thriller isolated within an epic battle, and although Annaud and cowriter Alain Godard (drawing from William Craig's book and David L. Robbins's novel The War of the Rats) fail to connect the parallel plots with any lasting impact, the production is never less than impressive. Highly conventional but handled with intelligence and superior craftsmanship, this is warfare as strategic entertainment, without compromising warfare as a manmade hell on Earth. --Jeff Shannon
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 370 more reviews...
 Disappointing April 2, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
The problem with this movie is that historical inaccuracies. If one is to make a movie based upon an actual event, it really should try to stick to what really happened. To make matters worse, great actors were stuck into bad parts and they seemed to just sleep-walk through the thing. Plus, Jude Law does a terrible Russian accent, when he even tries. Just a waste of time AND money.
 Romantic Triangle in Battle February 11, 2008
This is based on a true story from the Battle of Stalingrad. It tells how a sniper became a hero for publicity and morale. The first scene shows men crossing the river in the daytime! [Night crossings would prevent air attacks.] Wasn't there a Soviet Air Force to defend against those Stuka fighters? Were those soldiers only given one clip of ammunition? Next there is a charge against entrenched troops. Didn't they learn anything since WW I? [Or is this just symbolism and propaganda?] Vassily Zaitsev the shepherd knows how to shoot a rifle. Nikita Khrushchev is now in charge and asks for suggestions. Why not improve morale? The sniper's exploits are advertised for building morale. Women were used for sniper duty, successfully.
Vassily gets an experienced older sniper who studied in the German sniper school. The Germans use a captured soldier as lure to reveal a sniper's location. A young boy provides a story for a bar of chocolate. Major Koenig lays a clever trap, it almost works. Is that boy a double agent? Tanya and Vassily are nice to each other. There will be a new attack and Vassily is prepared for Koenig. Koenig is very clever to understand that boy, and lays a trap. Will wolf hunter Vassily become the hunted? Will personal emotion create an unneeded conflict? The film continues to the final showdown between Vassily and Koenig. Is it believable, or just a dramatic ending? Will Vassily meet Tanya for a happy ending?
The encircled German 6th Army surrendered at Stalingrad in February 1943. It was the end of the beginning. The Battle of Kursk in July 1943 marked the beginning of the end for Nazi Germany. You could read one book and learn a lot more than what you get from this entertainment; or most war films.
A microcosm of the gigantic war between the Nazis and Soviets. January 14, 2008
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
The opening scenes capture the realities of war almost as effectively as was done in "Saving Private Ryan." This movie does something that so many other WWII movies does so stupidly, though: It tries to drive a romance into the middle of a survival of the fittest mortal combat film. I don't mind such a thing in a work of fiction, but this movie is about the Battle of Stalingrad, which is probably the most important battle of WWII.
Actually, the film is about a legend that grew in Soviet Russia during WWII, and this story puts it into that great battle. The opening scenes are pure adrenaline pumping combat that is stark and terrible. As the film settles down, though, we begin to focus in on a highly politicized duel between a pair of snipers. One is a peasant from Russia. The other is a professional from Nazi Germany. They hunt for one another through the broken city of Stalingrad, each attempting to find their advantage against the other.
To be sure, the sniper scenes are a bit far fetched, the love story is strange, the political drama overdone. The mass combat is spectacular. Watch this film for a look at that for yourself. The climax is ridiculous, especially for a sniper war. I suggest that you watch this film once just to get an idea of the nature of combat between the professional German army and the conscripted peasant army of the Soviet Union. It will give you a small look at the struggle that cost 20 million Soviets' lives.
 Enemy at the Gates December 22, 2007
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Very powerful movie I've always enjoyed and now, my daughter is doing a report on the same. Thank goodness for continued excellent movie making !!! This is a movie that will certainly hold your attention and focuses on other aspects that certainly do occur during any war. Worth watching.
Historically inaccurate, pretentious, and dull December 22, 2007
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
Some of the top Amazon reviews of this picture praise Hollywood for making a war film about the Russian front. This was certainly the decisive battlefield in my opinion and has been underrepresented in Western film. Judging simply from Hollywood films, you'ld think the war was won when Rommel was thrown out of North Africa or when Tom Hanks landed on Omaha Beach. From my perspective, however, if this film is the best Hollywood can do to tell the story of the fighting on the Eastern front, they shouldn't bother. The basic premise of this film is a tale of two snipers hunting each other in the the ruins of Stalingrad. The Soviet sniper has killed many German officers, and the Germans has brought in a specialist from Berlin to counter him. Throw in a beautiful love interest, and you have the makings of a war melodrama. This film has so many flaws that my 2-star rating is generous. First, there are so many historical inaccuracies in this film that it has negative historical merit. That is, after watching this film, you'll know less about Stalingrad and the Eastern Front than before watching this film. Almost every bit of historical information in this film is wrong. A well made war movie should, in my opinion, try to retain as much historical accuracy as possible so that the viewer can both get a feel for the action and a learn something in the process. I'm not going to list everything that is wrong with this film (e.g. the Sniper Division?!?!?!?!?), but a five minute perusal of the Wikipedia entry on Stalingrad after watching this film will show you the gross inaccuracies. For a serious student of WWII, this film is an insult. Second, putting aside the historical inaccuracies, the story is overly melodramatic and simply dull. I didn't find the characters interesting, compelling, or believable. The director's attempts to portray the magnitude of the violence on the Eastern front were simply laughable. This film conveys none of the emotional impact of films such as Saving Private Ryan. This whole film feels like a video game. The love triangle aspect doesn't play out well, and the self-doubt of the characters gives the whole film an air of pretentiousness. It certainly does not make the characters more human, it makes them less interesting.
Bottom line - if you are an even somewhat serious student of WWII, I wouldn't waste my time watching this even as a rental. I strongly discourage anyone from actually buying this DVD, a waste of money. I give this film 2 stars because I've seen worse, but there isn't much here.
|
|
|