|
Eyes Wide Shut (R-Rated Edition) | 
 enlarge | Director: Stanley Kubrick
Actors: Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Madison Eginton, Jackie Sawiris, Sydney Pollack
Studio: Warner Home Video
Category: DVD
List Price: $24.98
Buy Used: $3.53
You Save: $21.45 (86%)
New (9) Used (24) Collectible (1) from $3.53
Avg. Customer Rating:  731 reviews
Sales Rank: 13051
Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, Dvd-video, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitled), French (Subtitled)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 159
Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1
DVD Layers: 2
DVD Sides: 1
Picture Format: Pan & Scan
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 5.4 x 0.6
ISBN: 0790747065
UPC: 085391765523
EAN: 9780790747064
ASIN: B00003CWPR
Theatrical Release Date: 1999
Release Date: March 7, 2000
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: 100% Satisfaction guaranteed! Item ships from CA. Please allow 4-14 business days for orders to arrive.
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com essential video
It was inevitable that Stanley Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut would be the most misunderstood film of 1999. Kubrick died four months prior to its release, and there was no end to speculation how much he would have tinkered with the picture, changed it, "fixed" it. We'll never know. But even without the haunting enigma of the director's death--and its eerie echo/anticipation in the scene when Dr. Bill Harford (Tom Cruise) visits the deathbed of one of his patients--Eyes Wide Shut would have perplexed and polarized viewers and reviewers. After all, virtually every movie of Kubrick's post-U.S. career had; only 1964's Dr. Strangelove opened to something approaching consensus. Quite apart from the author's tinkering, Kubrick's movies themselves always seemed to change--partly because they changed us, changed the world and the ways we experienced and understood it. And we may expect Eyes Wide Shut to do the same. Unlike Kubrick himself, it has time. So consider, as we settle in to live with this long, advisedly slow, mesmerizing film, how challenging and ambiguous its narrative strategy is. The source is an Arthur Schnitzler novella titled Traumnovelle (or "Dream Story"), and it's a moot question how much of Eyes Wide Shut itself is dream, from the blue shadows frosting the Harfords' bedroom to the backstage replica of New York's Greenwich Village that Kubrick built in England. Its major movement is an imaginative night-journey (even the daylight parts of it) taken by a man reeling from his wife's teasing confession of fantasized infidelity, and toward the end there is a token gesture of the couple waking to reality and, perhaps, a new, chastened maturity. Yet on some level--visually, psychologically, logically--every scene shimmers with unreality. Is everything in the movie a dream? And if so, who is dreaming it at any given moment, and why? Don't settle for easy answers. Kubrick's ultimate odyssey beckons. And now the dream is yours. --Richard T. Jameson
Amazon.com
It was inevitable that Stanley Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut would be the most misunderstood film of 1999. Kubrick died four months prior to its release, and there was no end to speculation how much he would have tinkered with the picture, changed it, "fixed" it. We'll never know. But even without the haunting enigma of the director's death--and its eerie echo/anticipation in the scene when Dr. Bill Harford (Tom Cruise) visits the deathbed of one of his patients--Eyes Wide Shut would have perplexed and polarized viewers and reviewers. After all, virtually every movie of Kubrick's post-U.S. career had; only 1964's Dr. Strangelove opened to something approaching consensus. Quite apart from the author's tinkering, Kubrick's movies themselves always seemed to change--partly because they changed us, changed the world and the ways we experienced and understood it. And we may expect Eyes Wide Shut to do the same. Unlike Kubrick himself, it has time.
So consider, as we settle in to live with this long, advisedly slow, mesmerizing film, how challenging and ambiguous its narrative strategy is. The source is an Arthur Schnitzler novella titled Traumnovelle (or "Dream Story"), and it's a moot question how much of Eyes Wide Shut itself is dream, from the blue shadows frosting the Harfords' bedroom to the backstage replica of New York's Greenwich Village that Kubrick built in England. Its major movement is an imaginative night-journey (even the daylight parts of it) taken by a man reeling from his wife's teasing confession of fantasized infidelity, and toward the end there is a token gesture of the couple waking to reality and, perhaps, a new, chastened maturity. Yet on some level--visually, psychologically, logically--every scene shimmers with unreality. Is everything in the movie a dream? And if so, who is dreaming it at any given moment, and why?
Don't settle for easy answers. Kubrick's ultimate odyssey beckons. And now the dream is yours. --Richard T. Jameson
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 495 more reviews...
 Illuminati secret symbolism layed out for the public to see... June 24, 2008
This movie is highly symbolic, loaded with symbolism about and secrets used by the global elite. Which is why most people find this film somewhat puzzling. Go to http://www.kentroversypapers.net/ for details about the meanings within. Classic Kubrick. Also see a review about the highly symbolic 2001 (about secrets of Alchemy) at: http://www.jayweidner.com/kubrick.htm
 Another Kidman Laughfest June 23, 2008
I won't go into the plot or major themes of this film, as other reviewers have done an adequate job of it. I truly believe actors make or break a movie. As such, this film could have been very good, but suffers deplorably from a lack of quality acting. Tom Cruise is not a favorite of mine, but does a passable job as the manic
spouse of a woman who shares her thoughts of infidelity.
I found Kidman's performance (as so often is the case with this highly overrated actress) substandard, to say the least. Gratuitous shots of her boney, barenaked assets (no less than three of them in the first third of the film with no context whatsoever) does not qualify as fine acting. The nauseatingly phony delivery she gives as a drunken party reveler at the beginning of the film sets the pace for the rest of the movie, in which she makes a miserable (and somewhat laughable) attempt at getting stoned in one scene and offers a pathetically false display of artificial emotion after relating a bad dream to her "husband" in another.
Other directors besides Kubrick have capitalized on Kidman's latent narcissism and tendency toward exhibitionism in order to mask the artificial quality of her acting. Cold Mountain and Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus are two recent examples that come to mind. Time and time again, Ms. Kidman makes acting choices that showcase her alleged physical "beauty" rather than reveal her true skill as a convincing and reliable actor. Eyes Wide Shut is no exception. Actresses such as Charlize Theron, Hilary Swank, and Cate Blanchett are exceptional not only because their physical beauty resonates on film when they portray "ordinary" women, but because they are willing to manipulate and transcend traditional images of beauty in order to explore other facets of female experience. Not ironically, Kidman finally received her prized golden statue when she dared to portray someone other than a shadow of her own superficial self in The Hours.
Personally, I found the subject matter of the film and the scenes involving the sex rituals to be provocative. Hence, two stars for a film that suffers from bad casting and unfilfilled potential but explores interesting
questions related to communication, trust, and fidelity among committed partners.
Garbage. Bad acting. Dull filmography. Horrendous lighting. Kubrick's a loser. June 17, 2008
1 out of 7 found this review helpful
I just watched this, and I don't know why. It was horrible. Cruise wasn't the only bad actor in this (Kidman did a good job of course), and he was BAD. The lighting is a constant red/blue warm/cold contrast that is more headache inducing than intriguing. Whoever was guiding the camera and setting shots was lackluster and just "got the job done." Kubrick, besides being a misogynistic f* with an adolescent appetite for his films' contents, really delivered nothing...and he took his time doing it.
This movie isn't bad because it wasn't sexy enough (I think it was sexy without need), nor because it was slow (I love slow, ponderous films), nor because there was no climax (same), it was because it was poorly directed and poorly written. The dialog is so often laughable. I was advised to see it as one of the creepiest films of all time. I never blinked. I felt like laughing at the attempts at creepiness though.
For people who want to point at the themes explored, it doesn't matter if a film brings themes up, it matters how it handles them. This did a poor, surface level job just in order that Kubrick could get his kicks out of using the F word and having nudity that isn't necessarily sexualized...oooo, how progressive!
I wasted my evening, don't waste yours.
Minds Wide Open June 9, 2008
I saw this movie in a theater, when it was premiered years ago. I found it haunting, dreamlike, and outside the normal realm of moviemaking. Most people did not like the movie then and I would assume most would not like it now. Its a movie that polarizes. I recently had the chance to view it again. Mesmerizing is the best way I can describe it. It pulls you into a dreamlike world and leaves you with many unanswered questions. The most chilling, riveting scene obviously is the "party". But what really gets to me in this scene is the deliberate striking of the piano keys especially the occasional but intentional off-key notes. It exudes forbodding and mortal anxiety. It is the quintessential cult scene. Kubrick created a movie that has aged well. Highly reccommended, but surely not for everyone.
'Forever' Is A Scary Word May 25, 2008
0 out of 7 found this review helpful
I have to give this movie five stars because of the lovely Nicole Kidman. But she's not the only gorgeous girl in the movie and there are none of those acursed artificial breast implants either. Stanley Kubrick really gave us something to cherish as his final work.
The movie starts out (and remains) strange and it has a sort of ghost like quality which is set around Christmas time. It touches on both the positive and negative aspects of sexually related issues and contains a lot of symbolism.
Alice has a few glasses of champagne at some rich guy's party which puts her more or less out of her mind and she starts talking in a trance like state and dancing with this guy who looks like Count Dracula.
Alice gets stoned and tells Dr. Bill about a fantasy she had about making out with this guy who she instantly fell in love with at first sight. I don't think this ever really happened but Dr. Bill thinks it may have and he starts visualizing these wonderful (but not to him) scenes in his mind. This is what causes him to start looking for love in all the wrong places as he also wants to experience that instantaneous and magical attraction.
I sort of relate personally to the Dr. Bill character (Cruise) although this may only be my imagination. Still I don't think think people would disagree that the movie contains some sort of hidden and secret message.
Dr. Bill and his wife Alice sometimes think about doing the wrong things but ultimately they are not truly evil people as most people aren't.
However Dr. Bill injects himself into a situation where the people are truly evil. To me this represents satanism.
In the movie Dr. Bill becomes a threat to that satanic cult because of what he knows about them. But in real life they rather become the threat when people are stupid enough to get involved with them and open that Pandora's box of evil. There comes a point where the box cannot be closed and Dr. Bill comes close to reaching that point.
There's a very important scene where Dr. Bill revists the castle where the 'party' happened and they hand him a horrible letter. People shouldn't write evil things in letters it's very dangerous.
Interestingly one of the people at the 'party' was wearing a mask that looks like the sun. The sun has been up there burning for a long time.
The evil spirits will first attack in the dream state which is exactly what happens to Alice.
Eventually Dr. Bill's reckless act threatens to destroy everyone that he holds dear in this world. This is not just fiction. It can happen.
Interestingly Cruise and Nicole were married when this movie was made I think. Sometimes a movie can mirror what's happening with the actors in real life.
Cruise joined the Church Of Scientology.
There's this old movie called 'The Wasp Woman' where this lady is somehow turned into a wasp. I heard somehow this really happened to the lady who played the part in the movie.
Jeff Marzano
The Shining [Blu-ray]
Irreversible
Human Trafficking
Horror Hotel
Possession
The Beast (La bête)
Images in a Convent
The Others (Two-Disc Collector's Edition)
|
|
|
Web Design, Maintenance, and Hosted by K9Sites.com | |